From: Baris Kazar
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 3:56 PM
To: Adrien Grand ; Lucene Users Mailing List
; Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and
BulkScorer.score()
Hi Adrien,-
Thanks for taking a look at it and sure, that will be very nice to fix
: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 3:18 PM
To: Lucene Users Mailing List
Cc: Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and
BulkScorer.score()
Hmm we should fix these access$ accessors by fixing the visibility of some
fields.
These breakdowns do not necessarily signal
looked into these methods:
> org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and BulkScorer.score()
>
>
> Lets start with BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() with its call tree and time
> spent:
>
>
> BooleanWeight.bulkScorer()
> -->> Weight.bulkS
Hi, -
I did more experiments and this time i looked into these methods:
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and BulkScorer.score()
Lets start with BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() with its call tree and time spent:
BooleanWeight.bulkScorer()
-->> Weight.bulk
: Adrien Grand
Sent: Saturday, October 2, 2021 1:44:40 AM
To: Lucene Users Mailing List
Cc: Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and
BulkScorer.score()
Is your profiler reporting inclusive or exclusive costs for each function? Ie.
does it exclude time
h process from
> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search() are spent on
> these units:
> org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and BulkScorer.score()
> Is there any study or project to speed up these please?
>
> Best regards
>
>
--
Adrien
Hi,-
I performance profiled my application via jvisualvm on Java
and saw that 75% of the search process from
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search() are spent on
these units:
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.bulkScorer() and BulkScorer.score()
Is there any study or project to speed
