Re: Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Erick Erickson
Ah... right I misunderstood your question, thought you were asking for the list f feature differences between 5x and 6x. There is never much development work done that far back, this was a special case. There will almost certainly never be features developed on the old major version this far into

Re: Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Corbin, J.D.
Adrien, that is what I was looking for...I am using 6.4.1 but was curious about the different branches. Thanks again. J.D. Corbin Senior Research Engineer Advanced Computing & Data Science Lab 3075 W. Ray Road Suite 200 Chandler, AZ 85226-2495 USA M: (303) 912-0958 E: jd.cor...@pearson.com

Re: Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Adrien Grand
Lucene 6.x is the stable branch while Lucene 5.x is the old stable branch. We would advise you to use 6.x if possible as it has more frequent releases and contains improvements that 5.x does not have. Le jeu. 16 févr. 2017 à 17:18, Corbin, J.D. a écrit : > Hi, > > I am aware of the changes docum

Re: Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Corbin, J.D.
Hi, I am aware of the changes documented, I was just curious why there are two baselines for Lucene, e.g., 5.x and 6.x. I would have assumed that 5.x was a precursor to 6.x, but obviously lucene has separate tracks for 5.x and 6.x. I'll look again at the changes and see if it details what is the

Re: Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Erick Erickson
Please read the CHANGES.txt in both the lucene and solr directories for all the changes between versions. The "New Features" section is probably the best overview, while the detailed bug changes are also listed. Both of the above are defined for each release. Best, Erick On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7

Lucene Versions

2017-02-16 Thread Corbin, J.D.
Today I noticed there is a new release of Lucene v5.5.4. What is the major difference(s) between the 5.x and 6.x lines of Lucene. Thanks, J.D. Corbin

Re: Creating Queries agnostic to Lucene Versions

2016-10-17 Thread Rajnish kamboj
Any thought on the below question? On Friday 14 October 2016, Rajnish Kamboj wrote: > Hi > > How can I make my Lucene queries agnostic to Lucene Versions? > > e.g. NumericRangeQuery in 5.3.1 is LegacyNumericRangeQuery in 6.0.0 > (NumericRangeQuery is completely removed) > > > > -- > Rajnish >

Creating Queries agnostic to Lucene Versions

2016-10-14 Thread Rajnish Kamboj
Hi How can I make my Lucene queries agnostic to Lucene Versions? e.g. NumericRangeQuery in 5.3.1 is LegacyNumericRangeQuery in 6.0.0 (NumericRangeQuery is completely removed) -- Rajnish

Re: possible latency increase from Lucene versions 4.1 to 4.4?

2013-09-16 Thread Adrien Grand
Hi John, I just had a look at Mike's benchs[1][2] which don't show any performance difference from approximately 1 year. But this only tests a conjunction of two terms so it might still be that latency worsened for more complex queries. [1] http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/AndHigh

possible latency increase from Lucene versions 4.1 to 4.4?

2013-09-13 Thread John Wang
Has anyone experienced a latency increase between the above versions? Mainly in conjunction queries. Thanks -John

Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

2010-04-28 Thread kannan chandrasekaran
Hi Adriano, Ahhh !!! Good point...Thanks a ton for the quick response. Kannan From: Adriano Crestani To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 7:31:20 PM Subject: Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene

Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

2010-04-28 Thread Adriano Crestani
Hi Kannan, contrib-queryparser code is not compatible with 2.4 release because it uses the Attribute API, which was only introduced in 2.9. Regards, Adriano Crestani On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:44 PM, kannan chandrasekaran wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a question regarding the new Lucene query pars

Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

2010-04-28 Thread kannan chandrasekaran
Hi All, I have a question regarding the new Lucene query parser framework in the contribs project. My company's project is running on top of 2.4.0 release of Lucene. I am trying to evaluate the new query parser framework that was added to the contribs project in the Lucene 2.9.0 release an

Re: lucene versions

2005-10-19 Thread Rick Hillegas
00 : From: Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: lucene versions : : Hello, : : I'm looking into integrating lucene with derby. I'm just starting out so : I'm afraid I'm going to pepper this li

Re: lucene versions

2005-10-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: lucene versions : : Hello, : : I'm looking into integrating lucene with derby. I'm just starting out so : I'm afraid I'm going to pepper this list with some newbie questions

lucene versions

2005-10-19 Thread Rick Hillegas
Hello, I'm looking into integrating lucene with derby. I'm just starting out so I'm afraid I'm going to pepper this list with some newbie questions. Here's one: The downloadable lucene distribution has rev level 1.4.3 and was released a year ago according to http://lucene.apache.org/java/doc