RE: lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-05 Thread Steven A Rowe
cene 2.3 > > > (with high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking > > > of doing this but wanted to get some feedback. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -John > > > > > > > > > > > > ---

Re: lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-04 Thread GokulAnand
-- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lucene-2.3-in-production-tp15276078p15283746.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list arc

Re: lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-04 Thread John Wang
Thanks Mark for the datapoint! -John On Feb 4, 2008 4:50 PM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Replied to the wrong thread - sorry about that. > > But to make up for it, I have been using 2.3 even before it was > released. I have so many tests for my app that I am pretty confident > runni

Re: lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Miller
Replied to the wrong thread - sorry about that. But to make up for it, I have been using 2.3 even before it was released. I have so many tests for my app that I am pretty confident running things off the trunk if all tests are a go, and there where so many goodies for 2.3 that I jumped on pret

Re: lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Miller
You still have to be careful if you want to alternate a search and write. If you are loading a lot of docs this way, you would want to hold the Writer to batch the docs, but while you are holding it, you will not have a fresh view of the index - so you could add the same doc twice if it came tw

lucene 2.3 in production

2008-02-04 Thread John Wang
Hi: Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3 (with high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of doing this but wanted to get some feedback. Thanks -John