Hi,
> I was pointed to Lucene from the Solr list. I am wondering if the
> performance of the below two queries is expected to be quite different and
> would they return the same set of results?
>
> field:*
> field:[* TO *]
>From the Lucene side they are identical, but it depends on the implement
Hello,
I was pointed to Lucene from the Solr list. I am wondering if the
performance of the below two queries is expected to be quite different and
would they return the same set of results?
field:*
field:[* TO *]
The use case I am trying to optimize is returning all documents that
contain any va
This is going to depend on the queryparser that you are using and the field
type of `field`. I agree both should be handled as efficiently.
Le jeu. 20 juil. 2017 à 22:56, Hendrik Haddorp a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I had already asked this on the Solr mailing list but would like to
> confirm this here:
Hi,
I had already asked this on the Solr mailing list but would like to
confirm this here:
If I want to query all documents that have a field or do not have a
field does it really perform better to use "field:[* TO *]" instead of
"field:*" ? I would have expected that Lucene handles both que
