On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Neal Richter wrote:
Collex is quite open source, its just ugly source :) We're the
'patacriticism' project at SourceForge, under the "collex" directory
in Subversion.
Collex implements tagging by implementing JOIN cross-references
between user/tag documents and regu
Collex is quite open source, its just ugly source :) We're the
'patacriticism' project at SourceForge, under the "collex" directory
in Subversion.
Collex implements tagging by implementing JOIN cross-references
between user/tag documents and regular object documents. It's
scalability is not goi
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm pretty sure this has been done, I'm just not 100% sure where. Does
Nutch index link text?
Nutch does do this sort of thing, but I'm not quite sure how. It
isn't doing any operations to the Lucene index beyond what plain ol'
Lucene does.
Nutch maintains a set of s
On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Steven Parkes wrote:
Are unindexed fields stored seperately from the main inverted
index?
If so then, one could implement the field value change as a
delete and
re-add of just that value?
The short answer is that won't work. Field values are
Are unindexed fields stored seperately from the main inverted
index?
If so then, one could implement the field value change as a
delete and
re-add of just that value?
The short answer is that won't work. Field values are stored in a
different data structure than the posting
On 2/27/07, Steven Parkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is true that you can store more data and that will make it possible
to get it back. Storing fields (w/ or w/o indexing) allows you to pull
them back. Storing term vectors gives you something in-between nothing
and everything.
I will look i
age-
From: Neal Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:52 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: document field updates
Steven Parkes wrote:
>There are no plans to do this. It's essentially impossible, given (1)
>the reverse nature of te
Steven Parkes wrote:
There are no plans to do this. It's essentially impossible, given (1)
the reverse nature of text indexes and (2) Lucene's write-once segment
architecture.
What if the field is stored and unindexed? It should be possible to
update the contents of that in isolation. How wo
java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: document field updates
I know this has been asked before, but I'd like to ask once more for
peace of mind.
Is there a way to do single field inserts/updates without deleing and
reinserting a document?
If the answer is no, what exactly would be entailed
I know this has been asked before, but I'd like to ask once more for peace of
mind.
Is there a way to do single field inserts/updates without deleing and
reinserting a document?
If the answer is no, what exactly would be entailed in adding this
functionality, or, better yet, is this plan
10 matches
Mail list logo
