Glad to help you.
Aalap Parikh wrote:
Thanks very much. Volodymyr, your trick about wildcard
search replacement has helped me a lot. Great idea!!!
Thanks a lot again.
--- Volodymyr Bychkoviak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi.
Aalap Parikh wrote:
Hi,
The idea about begin marker sound
Thanks very much. Volodymyr, your trick about wildcard
search replacement has helped me a lot. Great idea!!!
Thanks a lot again.
--- Volodymyr Bychkoviak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Aalap Parikh wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >The idea about begin marker sou
Hi.
Aalap Parikh wrote:
Hi,
The idea about begin marker sounds good. And the
prefix could be anything and could be made really
small by just using may be 2 or 3 or even less
characters.
if you want to use 1 character for begin marker make sure you don't nave
same tokens. But I think that making
Hi,
The idea about begin marker sounds good. And the
prefix could be anything and could be made really
small by just using may be 2 or 3 or even less
characters.
In terms of the PrefixQuery for 123* wildcard search,
wouldn't such a query be rewritten to a BooleanQuery?
I tried using PrefixQuery a
Hi,
first of all you'll never get TooManyClauseException because you're
sesarching for phrase query. (i.e. this query will not be rewrited into
boolean query).
about your question: if you need search like 123* you can use some term
as begining marker and include this term at the begining of phr
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
One more question. You mentioned that your technique
can be used for wildcard search like ex. *123* . But
say I only need something like 123* i.e. wildcard only
at the end and NOT on both sides, then how can one use
your technique to avoid TooManyClauseException?
Thanks
I used It to measure speed and but I was planning to use it in file
search application. when u need wildcard search like *.txt and so on.
The matter is that file search application is not my primary job, so I
will tune it later.
This is just an example to give you an idea how it can work.
reg
Hi,
> Also this analyzer is not used in any application, I
> wrote it only to
> measure search speed.
So you don't use the method you described for your
wildcard search trick?
Thanks,
Aalap.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Aalap Parikh wrote:
Hi Volodymyr,
About the trick you described about wildcard search
replacement, you mentioned:
So I found following workaround. I index this field
as > sequence of terms, each of containing single
digit from > needed value. (For example I have
“123214213” value
Hi Volodymyr,
About the trick you described about wildcard search
replacement, you mentioned:
> So I found following workaround. I index this field
as > sequence of terms, each of containing single
digit from > needed value. (For example I have
123214213 value
> that needs to be i
That's a great technique - thanks for sharing it!
Erik
On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Volodymyr Bychkoviak wrote:
Hi all.
I have large index of documents (about 1.6 millions)
One field (for example called “number”) contains string of digits.
I need to do wildcard search on this field such as
Hi all.
I have large index of documents (about 1.6 millions)
One field (for example called “number”) contains string of digits.
I need to do wildcard search on this field such as “*expression*” (i.e.
all documents that contains “expression” in this field.
When I run such search with very short e
12 matches
Mail list logo