On Mon, Jan 22, 2007, John Haxby wrote about "Re: Websphere and Dark Matter":
> Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Are you implying that the process memory shrinks, that memory is
> returned to the kernel? I didn't read the page you referenced that way.
> I know that if I a
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007, Rollo du Pre wrote about "Re: Websphere and Dark Matter":
I was hoping it would, yes. Does websphere not release memory back to
the OS when it not longer needs it? I'm concerned that if the memory
spiked for some reason (index
Thanks for this information, it was very useful.
Rol.
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007, Rollo du Pre wrote about "Re: Websphere and Dark Matter":
I was hoping it would, yes. Does websphere not release memory back to
the OS when it not longer needs it? I'm concerne
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007, Rollo du Pre wrote about "Re: Websphere and Dark Matter":
> I was hoping it would, yes. Does websphere not release memory back to
> the OS when it not longer needs it? I'm concerned that if the memory
> spiked for some reason (indexing a large d
Hi John,
I was hoping it would, yes. Does websphere not release memory back to
the OS when it not longer needs it? I'm concerned that if the memory
spiked for some reason (indexing a large document) then that would
hamper the rest of the OS because it'd hold on to far more memory than
is need
Rollo du Pre wrote:
We have a scenario where a web search app using Lucene causes
Websphere 5.1 allocated memory to grow but not shrink. JProfiler shows
the heap shrinks back ok, leaving the JVM with over 1GB allocated to
the jvm but only 400MB in use. Websphere does not perform a level 2
garbage
Hi,
Has anyone encountered significant amounts of Websphere Dark Matter
generation when using Lucene?
We have a scenario where a web search app using Lucene causes
Websphere 5.1 allocated memory to grow but not shrink. JProfiler shows
the heap shrinks back ok, leaving the JVM with over 1GB alloc
