1)
>> 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=field, doc=0)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Paul Libbrecht
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can the dictionary have weights?
>>>
>>> überwachungsgesetz alone probably needs a higher rank than überwachung
>>>
are combinations of other
sub-compounds.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz
hanks!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
>>
>> yes, your dictionary :)
>
--Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
>
> yes, your dictionary :)
>
> if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add
they are combinations of
other sub-compounds.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add it to your dictionary.
for example, if your dictionary is { "Rind", "Fleisch", "Draht", "Schere",
"Geset
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add it to your dictionary.
for example, if your dictionary is { "Rind", "Fleisch", "Draht", "Schere",
"Gesetz", "Aufgabe", "Überwachung" }, and you index
Rindfleischüberwachungsgesetz, then all 3 queries will have the same score.
but i
fleischgesetz"?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:12 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
Paul, there are two implementations in compounds, one is dictionary-base
Paul, there are two implementations in compounds, one is dictionary-based,
the other is hyphenation-grammar + dictionary (it restricts the
decompounding based on hyphenation rules). You could also subclass the
compound base class and implement your own.
I haven't seen any user-measures (relevance,
I'm interested to this analyzer.. it had escaped me and solves an old
problem!
Could you report about its usage:
- did you have to feed words in a dictionary?
- does anyone have user-measures already?
... and the last question for the research fun: is there any approach
towards preferring Üb
hi, it will work because it will also decompound "Rindfleish" into Rind and
fleish, with posIncr=0
so if you index Rindfleischüberwachungsgesetz, then query with "Rindfleish",
its matching because Rindfleish also gets decompounded into Rind and fleish.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Benjamin Do
Hello,
I've found a number of posts in different places talking about how to perform
decompounding, but I haven't found too many discussing how to use the results
of decompounding. If anyone can answer this question or point me to an existing
discussion it would be very helpful.
In the descrip
12 matches
Mail list logo
