Yes, your point made very good sense, thanks very much for helps!
Lisheng
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 5:53 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0
It's ha
vember 14, 2011 3:20 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0
>
>
>> Thanks for your reply!
>
> Thanks :-)
>
>> The reason why we cannot reuse IndexReader is that our server holds many
>> (>4000) independent index fold
-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:20 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0
> Thanks for your reply!
Thanks :-)
> The reason why we cannot reuse IndexReader is that our server holds many
> (>4000)
; From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:29 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Luc
nks very much for helps!
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:29 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0
Hi,
> We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading &quo
Hi,
> We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In Action"
> I learned that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a
> few queries to be fast.
This was always the case, not only since Lucene 2.9/3.0. You should warm your
2.3.2 to 3.1.0
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Zhang, Lisheng
wrote:
> We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In
> Action" I learned
> that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a few queries
> to be fast.
Make s
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Zhang, Lisheng
wrote:
> We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In
> Action" I learned
> that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a few queries
> to be fast.
Make sure to QA
We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In Action"
I learned
that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a few queries
to be fast.
But due to our special app we cannot "warm up" (each query has to use a new
IndexS
