Thanks Anshum.
Any one who used parallelReader, can yo provide me with a direction for this
particular issue? May be a good example using parallelReader to solve this
kind of problem would do.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Anshum wrote:
> ParallelReader though theoretically sounds useful,
ParallelReader though theoretically sounds useful, I doubt if how much the
overhead of maintaining and synchronizing the document ids would be. I
haven't used it so far, perhaps someone who's used the ParallelReader for
such a purpose on production environment/scale may help you.
--
Anshum Gupta
h
Anshum,
Yea, I would like to do what you mentioned. The source won't be available at
later time and also other reason I understand is that if I delete and add a
document, it would get a different ID and would return inconsistent results
later if I search index built on this documents. Does that mak
So what you essentially want is still being able to update a document. To
update a particular field in the lucene doc, you'd need to mark that field
as updated/deleted and create a new document with new field information
(that somehow gets merged while searching or gets taken care of in a similar
m
Hi Group,
I understand that the process of updating a document in lucene index is to
delete the document and add it again. But I do not want to delete the
document.
I was thinking of a approach where I can create a new index with only the
fields I want to update. And then may be I can some how me
