ics in Document addition
In your scenario, it might work, but I wonder how you generate hits,
excluding the fullyindexed=false.
-Original Message-
From: N Hira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2008 18:31
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction semantics in Do
In your scenario, it might work, but I wonder how you generate hits,
excluding the fullyindexed=false.
-Original Message-
From: N Hira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2008 18:31
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction semantics in Document addition
How about an
: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:02:52 AM
Subject: Re: Transaction semantics in Document addition
Dino Korah wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am dealing with a situation where a document could possibly have
> multiple
> attachments to it, and they are all added
Dino Korah wrote:
Hi All,
I am dealing with a situation where a document could possibly have
multiple
attachments to it, and they are all added to the index under a
document-id
(not lucene doc-id). Now if one of the attachments fail to get
indexed due
to failure of any subsystem like the
Hi All,
I am dealing with a situation where a document could possibly have multiple
attachments to it, and they are all added to the index under a document-id
(not lucene doc-id). Now if one of the attachments fail to get indexed due
to failure of any subsystem like the text extraction module, I
