> > Could you minimize this to a small stand-alone program that does not work
> > as expected?
>
> This will be hard, because of the bug only appearing after a couple of days
> or more and i'm starting to think that it is triggered by high data
> volumes. I'll try to minimize the code and serve mor
> Could you minimize this to a small stand-alone program that does not work
> as expected?
This will be hard, because of the bug only appearing after a couple of days
or more and i'm starting to think that it is triggered by high data
volumes. I'll try to minimize the code and serve more data to i
Sequence of operations seems logical, I don't see straight why this does
not work.
Could you minimize this to a small stand-alone program that does not work
as expected? This will allow to recreate the problem here and debug it.
It is interesting that facet 3.5 is used with core 3.4 and queries 3.4
All packages used: core3.4, queries3.4, facet3.5.
Once every 3 minutes I *refreshTax* and once per day I *reopenEveryting*.
*InitWriters()*
writer = new ThreadedIndexWriter
taxWriter = new LuceneTaxonomyWriter
// because the reader can't start if doesn't have a valid taxIndex directory
taxWriter.c
>
> However there are at least two issues with this:
> 1) the info would be in the lower level of the internal index writer, and
> not in that of the categories logic.
> 2) one cannot just call super.openIndexWriter(directory, openMode) and
> modify the result before returning it, because once IW i
>
> I'm having an issue with using NRT and Tax. After a couple of days of
> running continuously , the taxonomyreader doesn't return results anymore
> (but taxindex has them).
Taxonomy Reader does not support NRT - see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3441 ("Add NRT support to
Taxonom
Hello,
I'm having an issue with using NRT and Tax. After a couple of days of
running continuously , the taxonomyreader doesn't return results anymore
(but taxindex has them). How can i debug this?! does taxonomy index have a
logoutput like indexwriter has? will that be enough or relevant?
Current
