> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:53 PM
>
> Since the "stored fields" index would basically just be a
> database, perhaps this is better served using a traditional
> relational database (or even use the OS's file s
I've been thinking about splitting a (presumably large) Lucene index
up into two: one index only contains "indexed" (searchable) fields,
and the second index contains only stored fields. I'm interested in
whether this might increase response time or throughput for a
high-volume system. Google ap
