hi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:13 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, that's wha
http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Dawid Weiss
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 7:51:39 AM
> Subject: Re: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
&g
ne - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:54:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOv
stack?
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: T
ematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Uwe Schindler
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:54:44 PM
> Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
is buggy.
Uwe
> - Original Message
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:36:13 PM
> > Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
> >
> > Hi Otis,
> >
> > Can you r
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:36:13 PM
> Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
> Hi Otis,
>
> Can you reproduce this somehow and send test code? I could look into it. I
> don't expect the error in the quicksor
Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:17 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at some code that uses MemoryIndex (Lucene 3.1) and that's
> e
Hi Otis,
I have exactly the same scenario, also on 3.1, the only difference is I have
less queries, like 20 or 30.
Yesterday this code processed over 1 million incoming docs (in
a synthetic test), and did not get any error...
Not very helpful maybe but just so you get some other feedback.
javie
Hi,
I'm looking at some code that uses MemoryIndex (Lucene 3.1) and that's
exhibiting a strange behaviour - it slows down over time.
The MemoryIndex contains 1 doc, of course, and executes a set of a few thousand
queries against it. The set of queries does not change - the same set of
queries
10 matches
Mail list logo
