Erickson
发送时间: 2013年9月6日 21:07
收件人: java-user
主题: Re: Smart Chinese Analyzer Performance
Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction in
memory used for identical data, so I'd say so. The CHANGES.txt is where I'd
look to see if anything mentioned is worth your time.
Not
er.xu=aigine@lucene.apache.org
>[mailto:java-user-return-56896-oliver.xu=aigine@lucene.apache.org] 代表
>Erick Erickson
>发送时间: 2013年9月6日 21:07
>收件人: java-user
>主题: Re: Smart Chinese Analyzer Performance
>
>Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction
Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction in
memory used for identical data, so I'd say so. The CHANGES.txt is where I'd
look to see if anything mentioned is worth your time.
Not to mention SolrCloud...
Erick
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Darren Hoffman wrote:
> I
Thanks for the feedback. I'll keep pressing on then.
BTW, I'm not using solr; I am building an Android app.
On 9/6/13 1:06 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
>Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction in
>memory used for identical data, so I'd say so. The CHANGES.txt is where
I am using the SmartChineseAnalyzer in v3.6 but accessing or instantiating
it for the first time takes 10 to 15 seconds before it does anything. I do
not see this huge delay with StandardAnalyzer.
Is it loading a cache? Is there someway to speed it up?
I am currently using Lucene 3.6 and am tryin
