Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

Thanks Erick for you insight. I'd appreciate if someone could throw more light on it. Thanks On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I'm going to have to leave answering that to people with more > familiarity with the underlying code than I have... > > That said, I'd #guess# th

Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

I'm going to have to leave answering that to people with more familiarity with the underlying code than I have... That said, I'd #guess# that you'll be OK because I'd #guess# that filters are maintained on a per-reader basis and the results are synthesized when combined in a MultiSearcher. But th

Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

Thanks Erick, you cleared some of my confusions. But I still have a doubt. As you can see in previous example code I am re-creating parallel multi searcher for each search. (This is the actual scenario on production servers) The ParallelMultiSearcher constructor is taking different combination of

Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

Ignore my previous, I thought you were constructing your own filters. What you're doing should be OK. Here's the source of my confusion. Each of your indexes has Lucene document IDs starting at 0. In your example, you have two docs/index. So, if you created a Filter via lower-level calls, it coul

Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

Hi Erick, Thanks for the reply. Your answer have puzzled me more because what I am able to view is not what you say or I am not able to grasp your meaning. I have written a small program which is exactly what my original question was. Here I am creating a CachingWrapperFilter on one index and reu

Re: Single filter instance with different searchers

I'm assuming you're down in Lucene land. Unless somehow you've gotten 63 separate filters when you think you only have one, I don't think what you're doing will work. Or I'm failing to understand what you're doing at all. The problem is I expect each of your indexes starts with document 1. So your

Single filter instance with different searchers

Hi. We have a large index (~ 28 GB) which is distributed in three different directories, each representing a country. Each of these country wise indexes is further distributed on the basis of last update date into 21 smaller indexes. This index is updated once in a day. A user can search into any