: Thanks for the suggestions. I've used indexed n-grams before to implement
: spell-checking; I think in this case I may take a look at WildcardTermEnum
: and RegexTermEnum. It seems like a good solution because I am doing my own
: results ordering so Lucene's scoring is irrelevant in this case. I
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the suggestions. I've used indexed n-grams before to implement
spell-checking; I think in this case I may take a look at WildcardTermEnum
and RegexTermEnum. It seems like a good solution because I am doing my own
results ordering so Lucene's scoring is irrelevant in this case.
Warning: I don't understand ngrams at all, so you should
read this as a plea for those who do to tell me I'm off base .
But I wonder if indexing as n-grams would be a way to
cope with this issue that lots of people have. *assuming*
you are thinking about single terms, then it seems that
"smith" w
Hello,
I am currently keeping an index of all our client's usernames. The search
functionality is implemented using a PrefixFilter. However, we would like to
expand the functionality to be able to search any part of a user's name,
rather than requiring that it begin with the query string. So for e
Hello,
I am currently keeping an index of all our client's usernames. The search
functionality is implemented using a PrefixFilter. However, we would like to
expand the functionality to be able to search any part of a user's name,
rather than requiring that it begin with the query string. So for e
