;s applied to that 1 Token.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Andre Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:15:25 AM
&g
there is an entry about wildcards and analysis (which
> doesn't take place for wildcard queries). Could that be it?
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message
&g
--
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Andre Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:30:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: Searching Tokenized x Un
gt;
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:30:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
>
> My searches for my String tokenized field was working properly. I
> switched the field to un_tokenized, rebuilt the index, and now my
> searches
, untokenized means "full string" -
> it requires an "exact match".
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Andre Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: java-us
va-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 8:04:04 PM
> Subject: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
>
> Hi all,
>
> When I switched a String field from tokenized to untokenized, some
> searches started not returning some obvious values. Am I missing
> something o
Hi all,
When I switched a String field from tokenized to untokenized, some
searches started not returning some obvious values. Am I missing
something on querying untokenized fields? Another question is, do I
need an Analyzer if my search is on an Untokenized field, wouldn't the
search be based on
