Re: Search performance under high load

Yura Smolsky wrote: Hello, mark. mh> 2) My app uses long queries, some of which include mh> very common terms. Using the "MoreLikeThis" query to mh> drop common terms drastically improved performance. If mh> your "killer queries" are long ones you could spot mh> them and service them with a MoreLik

Re[2]: Search performance under high load

Hello, mark. mh> 2) My app uses long queries, some of which include mh> very common terms. Using the "MoreLikeThis" query to mh> drop common terms drastically improved performance. If mh> your "killer queries" are long ones you could spot mh> them and service them with a MoreLikeThis or simply mh>

Re: Search performance under high load

In addition to the comments already made, I recently recently found these changes to be useful: 1) Swapping out Sun 1.4.2_05 JVM for BEA's JRockit JVM halved my query times. (In both cases did not tweak any default JVM settings other than -Xmx to ensure adequate memory allocation). 2) My app use

Re: Search performance under high load

Daniel, On Thursday 07 April 2005 00:54, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Queries: The query strings are of highly differing complexity, from > : simple x:y to long queries involving conjunctions, disjunctions and > : wildecard queries. > : > : 90% of the queries run brilliantly. Problem is that 10%

Re: Search performance under high load

Daniel Herlitz wrote: Hi everybody, We have been using Lucene for about one year now with great success. Recently though the index has growed noticably and so has the number of searches. I was wondering if anyone would like to comment on these figures and say if it works for them? Index size: ~

Re: Search performance under high load

: Queries: The query strings are of highly differing complexity, from : simple x:y to long queries involving conjunctions, disjunctions and : wildecard queries. : : 90% of the queries run brilliantly. Problem is that 10% of the queries : (simple or not) take a long time, on average more that 10 se

Search performance under high load

Hi everybody, We have been using Lucene for about one year now with great success. Recently though the index has growed noticably and so has the number of searches. I was wondering if anyone would like to comment on these figures and say if it works for them? Index size: ~2.5 GB, on disk Number