Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-30 Thread Ray Tsang
is value is incremented for > an acceptible hit. > Does it make sense? > If it is possible, i'll dig deeper into the code of the Hits/Scorer classes. > > Thanks in advance, > kapilChhabra > > > -- > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: > http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a748901 > >

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-30 Thread kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com)
r an acceptible hit. Does it make sense? If it is possible, i'll dig deeper into the code of the Hits/Scorer classes. Thanks in advance, kapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a748901

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-30 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Suppose I cluster the results only on the 1st field i.e. I do not show : the constituent clusters. Even in this case, i'll require around 900 : Filters[i have 900 unique terms] in memory and will have to run the same : query 900 times, 1 on each Filter. I am sitting at a situation where I : get

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-28 Thread kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com)
rection? 2. If yes, then what else can be a more feasible solution? Thanks in anticipation, kapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a731549

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
. : Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:46:46 -0700 (PDT) : From: "kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, : kapilChhabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Search Results Clustering : : : Hi Al

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-24 Thread Nader Henein
oup by" What can be the options of doing this? And which is the best way to do it? Thanks in anticipation, Regards, kapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a697377 -- Nader S. Henein Seni

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-24 Thread kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com)
Thanks in anticipation, Regards, kapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a697377

Re: Search Results Clustering

2005-08-24 Thread Nader Henein
ighly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Regards, KapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a696937 -- Nader S. Henein Senior Applications Architect Bay

Search Results Clustering

2005-08-24 Thread kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com)
---results in [FILED-4:others] = 20 I have no clue how to do it using a single index. Any pointers in this will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Regards, KapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html