On Thursday 16 June 2005 21:03, Sean O'Connor wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. I had assumed that to be the case, but
> assumptions have a tendency to come back and bite me in inappropriate
> places. By pointing that out, you've probably saved me from beating my
> head against the wall in
On Jun 16, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Sean O'Connor wrote:
The big stumbling block I have at the moment is understanding
whether Terms can be used to find something like a phrase query,
proximity query, or boolean query. I think the answer is no, two
different concepts.
Terms are the heart of sear
Thanks for the clarification. I had assumed that to be the case, but
assumptions have a tendency to come back and bite me in inappropriate
places. By pointing that out, you've probably saved me from beating my
head against the wall in the near future : -).
The big stumbling block I have at the
On Jun 16, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Sean O'Connor wrote:
Yes, see the Javadoc for IndexReader.termPositions().
I'm probably missing the obvious here, but I assume this refers to
the analyzed terms (i.e. individual words, possibly transmogrified by
the analyzer).
Just to respond to part of your m
Hello,
I am trying to find the right approach for finding frequency (and,
slightly lower in priority, location) of search hits in a document. I
am working through the online documentation and the helpful "Lucene in
Action" book. There are several examples and explanations which seem
close, but
