On 22/7/2010 9:20 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
How is that different than extending QP?
Mainly because the problem I'm having isn't there, and doing it from
there doesn't feel right, and definitely not like solving the issue. I
want to explore what other options there are before doing anything, an
>
> Ideally, that would be through a class or a function I can override or
> extend
>
How is that different than extending QP?
About the "song of songs" example -- the result you describe is already what
will happen. A document which contains just the word 'song' will score lower
than a document
On 19/7/2010 5:50 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
If your analyzer outputs b and b$ in the same position, then the below query
will already be what the QP output today If you want to incorporate
boosting, I can suggest that you extend QP, override newTermQuery for
example, and if the term is a stemmed term
If your analyzer outputs b and b$ in the same position, then the below query
will already be what the QP output today If you want to incorporate
boosting, I can suggest that you extend QP, override newTermQuery for
example, and if the term is a stemmed term, then set the query's boost
(Query.setBoo
Shai, you got it right. I want to be able to send "b bb" through the QP
with my custom analyzer, and get back "(b b$) (b bb$)" -- 2 terms with 2
tokens in the same position for each.
I want this to be a native product of the engine, as opposed to forcing
this from the query end. I'm using diff
Depends for which query no? ;)
Sounds like you want to simulate the QP behavior
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html for
boosting. Meaning, if for the query "b" you want to simulate the query
"b OR b$^2" and have matches of b$ count more than b, then I'd follow
how QP does it
Hi all,
Consider the following string: "the buffalo buffaloes" [1].
When passed through a stemming analyzer, the resulting token would be
"buffalo buffalo" (assuming a good stemmer).
To enable exact searches, say I mark the original term and index it at
the same term position. So "the buf
