ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: to 2006-05-18 20:09
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics
On May 18, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Marcus Falck wrote:
> But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache!
Well, the more RAM you have the better when it comes
On May 18, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Marcus Falck wrote:
But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache!
Well, the more RAM you have the better when it comes to Solr
responsiveness, I'm sure. But, Solr leverages some caching
cleverness so the queries and filters used most frequently are in
But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache!
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 17:24
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics
On 5/18/06, Marcus Falck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 5/18/06, Marcus Falck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ?
Yes, but Solr handles the mechanics of warming up a new searcher in
the background to avoid those lengthy first-time hits to the
FieldCache and norms, and it warms any configured caches
Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ?
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 14:57
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics
On May 18, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Marcus Falck
On May 18, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Marcus Falck wrote:
Yes I know. But the index is changed constantly.
Then use Solr :))
Erik
/ Marcus
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 12:52
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne:
Yes I know. But the index is changed constantly.
/ Marcus
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 12:52
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Sort problematics
On May 18, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Marcus Falck wrote:
> Yes E
