Re: SIGSEGV when indexing documents.

2012-01-11 Thread Dawid Weiss
No clue, I am not a hardware expert. Removing memory extensions one by one (or binary-searching for the faulty one)? Dawid On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Frank Moss wrote: > The same with IBM J9. The dump file is attached. > > It seems to be HW related. Recently, we have added more RAM. We ac

Re: SIGSEGV when indexing documents.

2012-01-11 Thread Dawid Weiss
Opps, yes, sorry -- I only quickly looked at the invocation line on stack overflow and overlooked it. -Xms4g shouldn't make any difference. Dawid On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Frank Moss wrote: > 4gb is the initial heap size. Are you  thinking about Xss?  I will try it > as well as the rest

Re: SIGSEGV when indexing documents.

2012-01-11 Thread Frank Moss
4gb is the initial heap size. Are you thinking about Xss? I will try it as well as the rest of your suggestions and post back the results. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > The dump you're getting indicates a sigserv in a garbage collection. > This isn't unlikely

Re: SIGSEGV when indexing documents.

2012-01-11 Thread Dawid Weiss
The dump you're getting indicates a sigserv in a garbage collection. This isn't unlikely (there are bugs in there as well), but less likely than a hardware error on your side... at least in my opinion. I would experiment with the following: 1) do you really need a 4gb max stack? Seems weird to me.