On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Trejkaz wrote:
>
> within(5, 'my', and('cat', 'dog')) -> within(5, 'my', within(10, 'cat',
> 'dog') )
To extend my example and maybe make it a bit more hellish, take this one:
within(2, A, and(B, or(C, and(D, E
After rewriting both and() to SpanNearQ
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Can you do something approximately equivalent like:
>
> within(5, 'my', and('cat', 'dog')) ->
> within(5, 'my', within(5, 'cat', 'dog') )
>
> Might not be exactly the same in terms of distances (eg "cat x x x my x x x
> dog") might match the
On 8/4/2011 9:06 PM, Trejkaz wrote:...
For AND (and for any "default boolean" queries which aren't equivalent
to OR) queries, I have problems. For instance, you can't do this:
within(5, 'my', and('cat', 'dog')) -> and( within(5, 'my', 'cat'),
within(5, 'my', 'dog') )
The problem is that
Hi all.
I am writing a custom query parser which strongly resembles
StandardQueryParser (I use a lot of the same processors and builders,
with a slightly customised config handler and a completely new syntax
parser written as an ANTLR grammar.) My parser has additional syntax
for span queries. T
