Re: Reverse Searching

Hi Steven, Thanks for the information, its very useful. I am definitely going to give it a try and will ask if I get into any problem. thanks -siraj On 5/17/2010 5:59 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Siraj, The usual answer to questions like yours ("Will performance of Lucene component X against

RE: Reverse Searching

Hi Siraj, The usual answer to questions like yours ("Will performance of Lucene component X against my N records be good enough?") is "It depends": on the nature of the queries, the nature of the documents, the hardware you run on, etc. That said, if you construct your query objects once and r

Re: Reverse Searching

Hi Steven, Thanks for the quick reply. I checked the documentation of MemoryIndex and it seems like, you have to create an index in memory with one document and will have to run the queries against that single document. But my dilemma is, I might have upto 100,000 queries to run against it.

RE: Reverse Searching

Hi Siraj, Lucene's MemoryIndex can be used to serve this purpose. >From >: [T]his class targets fulltext search of huge numbers of queries over comparatively small transient r

Reverse Searching

Hello there, In oracle text search there is a feature to reverse search using ctxrule. What it does is, you create an index (ctxrule) on a column having your search criteria(s) and then throw a document on it and it tells you which criteria(s) it satisfies. Is there something in Lucene that