> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
>>>>>>>writer.addDocument(doc);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> writer.optimize();
>>>>>>> writer.close();
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>
xample, if my records are "Knowing yourself" and "Old
clinic", the correct search would return 2 matches, but it only
matches with "Knowing yourself".
How could I fix this?
;>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you so much!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/8/
r to the beginning of the pattern, so if
>>>>>> Huntsman84
>>>>>> is using the default implementation, then I agree with Ian: I'm
>>>>>> surprised
>>>>>> it matches either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, the Jakarta Reg
lementation (the default RegexQuery
>>>>> implementation) actually uses Matcher.lookingAt(), which is equivalent
>>>>> to
>>>>> prepending a "^" anchor to the beginning of the pattern, so if
>>>>> Huntsman84
>&g
using the Jakarta Regexp implementation? If so,
>>>> then
>>>> like you, I'm surprised it's not matching both :).
>>>>
>>>> It would be useful to see some real code, including how you index your
>>>> records.
>>>>
ould be useful to see some real code, including how you index your
>>> records.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Huntsman84
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > I am using RegexQuery for searching in a set of records wich are
>
e.g. "in"). For that case,
>>> > I am building the query with the regular expression ".in.", so it
>>> > should return all phrases with contain "in", but the search only
>>> > matches
first word of the phrase.
>> >
>> > For example, if my records are "Knowing yourself" and "Old
>> > clinic", the correct search would return 2 matches, but it only
>> > matches with "Knowing yourself".
>> >
>> &g
On 5/8/2009 at 9:13 AM, Ian Lee wrote:
> I'm surprised that it matches either - don't you need ".*in" where .*
> means match any character zero or more times? See the javadoc for
> java.util.regex.Pattern, or for Jakarta Regexp if you are using that
> package.
>
> Unless you're an expert in regex
I'm surprised that it matches either - don't you need ".*in" where .*
means match any character zero or more times? See the javadoc for
java.util.regex.Pattern, or for Jakarta Regexp if you are using that
package.
Unless you're an expert in regexps it is probably worth playing with
them outside y
e phrase.
>
> For example, if my records are "Knowing yourself" and "Old clinic", the
> correct search would return 2 matches, but it only matches with "Knowing
> yourself".
>
> How could I fix this?
> --
> View this message in context:
>
ow could I fix this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RegexQuery-Incomplete-Results-tp23445235p23445235.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-u
13 matches
Mail list logo
