Yang,
If you could send some more details...it would be really helpful.
Thanks
Quoting Yang Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have asked the exact same question a few weeks ago. I just follow
the customized distance example and loop the results again to get
another field and compute the scores. It
: I have asked the exact same question a few weeks ago. I just follow the
: customized distance example and loop the results again to get another
: field and compute the scores. It will be painful if you need more than 3
: fields. So far I didn't find any other way to do it. Hope we can see
It's
I have asked the exact same question a few weeks ago. I just follow the
customized distance example and loop the results again to get another
field and compute the scores. It will be painful if you need more than 3
fields. So far I didn't find any other way to do it. Hope we can see
some new cl
No...the information is available only at search time
Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Could your computation be done at indexing time rather than at search
time? If so, pre-compute the value and index that into a single
field.
Erik
On Apr 18, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Urvashi G
Could your computation be done at indexing time rather than at search
time? If so, pre-compute the value and index that into a single field.
Erik
On Apr 18, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Urvashi Gadi wrote:
Hello All,
My requirement is to combine 2 or more fields using some critera
(for exa