Re: test

Yes, please. Welcome. Best regards From: Claude Lepere Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 1:32 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: test Am I subscribed, please? Claude Lepère claudelep...@gmail.com

Re: Test File locks

Hi Ian and Chris, Thanks for the responses. I seem to have jarred the lock loose. Not exactly sure what step did it as I tried tweeking the OS, using Ian's suggestion of the SimpleFSLockFactory and tried various UNC paths to specify the directory. I've tried to work backwards to re-create the pro

Re: Test File locks

It would be helpful to know: 1) what version of Lucene you are using 2) what exactly like 167 of LibraryBuilder looks like (ie: what options are you using when instantiating the IndexWRiter) 3) what filesystems are using on each of the two different machines you are using. 4) does it really say

Re: Test File locks

No answers but some things you could try: There have been some reports of problems with file paths being specified in different ways - UNC versus something else perhaps. Use SimpleFSLockFactory rather than the default native class. Try a recent version of lucene unless you already are. -- Ian.

Re: test

Can you provide more details? EG a full exception? What was the app doing (indexing, searching, both)? Mike On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Antony Joseph wrote: > Hi, > > In a long running process Lucene get crashed in my application, Is there any > way to diagnose or how can I  turn on debug

RE: test

Hi, In a long running process Lucene get crashed in my application, Is there any way to diagnose or how can I turn on debug logging / trace logging for Lucene? Thanks Antony -- DigitalGlue, India - To unsu

Re: Test. Please ignore that. Fwd: How to send mail to java user

+1. I've got On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Raymond Balmès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm getting plenty of message but do you receive mine... please someone > give > me reply > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Leonid Maslov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message --

Re: Test. Please ignore that. Fwd: How to send mail to java user

I'm getting plenty of message but do you receive mine... please someone give me reply On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Leonid Maslov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sankari Palanisamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM > Subject:

Re: Test my Lucene service

Jmeter Otis Gospodnetic wrote: In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf: http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+performance , so that's one way of doing it. I've also written multi-threaded search benchmarking app that keeps the concurrency level const

Re: Test my Lucene service

Why test? LOL. just release your software and you'll find the answer, at least that is what I did:) www.megueii.com On 1/8/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf: http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+pe

Re: Test my Lucene service

In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf: http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+performance , so that's one way of doing it. I've also written multi-threaded search benchmarking app that keeps the concurrency level constant, goes through a log of queries

Re: Test my Lucene service

Well, my testing mostly consisted of capacity testing. I'm using XmlRpc as my communication mechanism and simply fired up a (configurable) number of threads to pound my search service with semi-random queries and measured the response time. Your results may vary depending on how your index is stru

Re: Test new query parser?

I have received a few inquires about my new query parser. I apologize for making that announcement a little premature. My current implementation only allows simple mixing of proximity queries with boolean queries...complex mixing would result in an incorrect search. A reply to my first email ma

Re: Test new query parser?

It is interesting to note that Lucene would also seem to suffer from bugs when using spans if you only have a single document in the index. At least with the NotSpanQuery, the spans could wrap around the document from end to beginning. This would be unexpected but would also go away if you add

Re: Test new query parser?

Mark -- Don't lose hope! We are migrating from Verity to Lucene, and I know for a fact that we will have to support the kind of complex queries you talk about; maybe not /quite/ as complex as your magnificent: cop | fowl & (fowl | priest & man) ! helicopter ~8 (hillary | tom) but certainly mo

Re: Test new query parser?

You are not kidding. I keep finding this tougher and tougher. Originally my method worked for most simple queries, but not all. I improved it to cover some more ground, allowing some modestly complex queries, but now even that improvement seems woefully inadequate for solving the general case.

Re: Test new query parser?

Mark -- Yes please! I'm very interested in the mixing of boolean and proximity operators. I have also worked on a parser (using JavaCC) but haven't managed to crack queries such as: ((a OR b) AND c) NEAR (d NOT e) I can get the parse tree okay, but haven't figured out how to translate that

Re: Test new query parser?

Great, I will get something ready to be given out within a day or so then. Paragraph/Sent prox support is one thing I really need to test and improve. The parapraph and sentence search uses a SpanWithinQuery. This is just a SpanNotQuery that can span a specified number of times instead of not at

Re: Test new query parser?

On Aug 21, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote: Is anyone interested in helping me test out a new query parser (i.e is anyone interested in using this, thereby helping me test it) ? I'm definitely interested in giving it a try. The syntax looks nice. ~5p is a 'within 5 paragraphs' ~6s is a