On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:32 +0200, Vasily Borisov wrote:
> the presentation layer for them is never good since the user is
> exposed to the data model complexity
Isn't that why we have facades?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
I agree completely. I was mostly responding to what appeared to be an
attempt to use lucene to actually execute a database query, which is
entirely different from restructing legacy data into a more-usable form as
you point out, and in which case all bets are off.
Erick
On 8/1/06, Vasily Borisov
Eric,
I'm sure that is entirely true. E.g. in E&P industry we have a bunch of
legacy relational databases that are tremendously complex.
Therefore the presentation layer for them is never good since
the user is exposed to the data model complexity every time he uses this
database.
So, giving up
You're absolutely right, lucene is a text searching tool, not a database
tool. There's no point in trying to jump through hoops to use lucene if your
database already works for you.
If you're trying to do text searches, particularly if want to ask questions
like "find the words biggest and large
hi sandip,
first get all those fields on which you want search and store
it in some var.
then apply indexing with these var.
then fire ur search query
regards
amit kumar
DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the
property of Persistent
