Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
> Ingram Content Group >> (615) 213-4311 >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Samuel García Martínez [mailto:samuelgmarti...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:33 AM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: possible bug on

Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
a JIRA issue with all the details without a test? > > James Dyer > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > > -Original Message- > From: Samuel García Martínez [mailto:samuelgmarti...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:33 AM > To: java-user@l

RE: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Dyer, James
] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:33 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: possible bug on Spellchecker Importance: Low I'm using Solr 3.6 and DirectSpellchecker is available only on v4+. Moreover, in "big" indexes i prefer using sidekick index rather than iterating over

Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
I'm using Solr 3.6 and DirectSpellchecker is available only on v4+. Moreover, in "big" indexes i prefer using sidekick index rather than iterating over term dictionary. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Any reason that you are not using the DirectSpellChecker? > > See: > h

Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-20 Thread Jack Krupansky
Any reason that you are not using the DirectSpellChecker? See: http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/suggest/org/apache/lucene/search/spell/DirectSpellChecker.html -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Samuel García Martínez Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:34 PM To: java-user@