Can you tell us what your queries are? Is it simple term queries,
phrases, fuzzy, etc?
I think the bad guy here is the term "hotel", that so many documents
contains it. You could try loading the full index to II and see how
long time it take to match just that term and compare. And then try
" It is strange that it should take 20 second to gather fields,"
20s including search and gather fields, it's the total time
2010/8/27 Karl Wettin :
> My mail client died while sending this mail.. Sorry for any duplicate.
>
> It is strange that it should take 20 second to gather fields, this is th
if I index only 7k documents, the time comparison:
time1: 7602331019 time2: 4246878035 total1: 10736 total2: 7393
it seems II is faster than RAMDirectory.
My indexed texts are all hotel names (chinese and english, litter french).
it has about 100k terms. terms such as hotel is very frequent and
ho
My mail client died while sending this mail.. Sorry for any duplicate.
It is strange that it should take 20 second to gather fields, this is
the only thing that really suprises me. I'd expect it to be instant
compared to RAMDirectory. It is hard to say from the information you
provided. Did
