Hi Nico,
On 08/05/2008 at 9:44 AM, Nico Krijnen wrote:
> On 5 aug 2008, at 11:11, Karsten F. wrote:
> > Can't you store only the relevant path in an extra lucene
> > field and set the maximum of query-terms to e.g. 2048 ?
>
> @Karsten: We did think about simplifying permissions to just top-level
>
Thanks for the replies,
We'll try the filters then, possibly with cache if required for
performance.
@Karsten: We did think about simplifying permissions to just top-level
folders, which is probably suitable for 80% of our clients. If the
filter is too slow we may have to. In that case it
This situation is pretty much the kind of thing PrefixFilters
were written for, so I'd certainly try those first, with or
without caching. I was surprised at how fast filters
get constructed, so I'd just try it and take a few measurements.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Nico Krijnen <
Hi Nico Krijnen,
I think it is ok, to store a filter for each user-session im memory.
And I think that a cached filter is the correct approach for permissions.
(extra memory usage = one bit for each user and each document)
Hopefully someone with more experience will also answer your question.
B
