thanks Grant, great pointers! With these and other previous replies I
think I'm good to write up a good case for lucene. I'll look for perf
numbers over releases (but I don't have the time to create those
numbers from scratch unfortunately).
regards,
javier
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Grant
Hi JM,
On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:01 AM, jm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile some arguments in favour of lucene as
> management is deciding weather to standardize on lucene or a competing
> commercial product (we have a couple of produc, one using lucene,
> another using commercial product, im
Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:09 AM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:09 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> And I was just thinking the othe
Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: jm
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, June 24, 2010 3:50:58 AM
> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> I want to add some perf numbers
http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: jm
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:57:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>>
>> yes, in my case
search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: jm
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:57:32 PM
> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> yes, in my case the competition is one of the list...
p://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:54:34 PM
> Subject: RE: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> Otis, I'm 99% sure Attivio is just a wrapper arrou
> > dtSearch
> > ISYS
> > Oracle
> > ...
> > ...
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Messag
rkl
>> To: java-user
>> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:15:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>>
>> Just curious. What commercial alternatives are out there?
>
> On Wed, Jun 23,
>> 2010 at 04:01, jm <
>>
12:42 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> Off the top of my head:
>
> FAST
> Endeca
> Coveo
> Attivio
> Vivisimo
> Google Search Appliance
> (tell me when to stop)
> Dieselpoint
-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Hans Merkl
> To: java-user
> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:15:46 PM
> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition
>
> Just curious. What commercial alternatives are out there?
On Wed, Jun 23,
> 2010
Just curious. What commercial alternatives are out there?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:01, jm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile some arguments in favour of lucene as
> management is deciding weather to standardize on lucene or a competing
> commercial product (we have a couple of produc, one
thanks guys, those links are cool. I welcome any other positive thing
anyone can add. Specially references of products/sites moving to
lucene/solr
javier
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Lucene/Solr choice typically means:
>
> * lower cost of ownership (think about var
Lucene/Solr choice typically means:
* lower cost of ownership (think about various crazy licensing models some of
the commercial search vendors have: per doc, per server, per query, per
year)
* faster implementation (just think about the duration of the sales/negotiation
phase for commerci
One thing to consider is that you have access to the source,
so worst-case you won't be cut off at the knees by the commercial
vendor.
Case in point: Fast was acquired by Microsoft, who have since
dropped all future Unix development. Hope all Fast users
really like running their apps on Windows se
16 matches
Mail list logo
