> A big index is slow to merge, slow to search, and as you mentioned,
> it's slow to sync. An 1G index took me several hours to merge on a P3
> 1GHz 512MRam
Don't forget "slow to back-up".
--
Regards,
Rus
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Hi Benjamin,
I don't know what exactly your application is doing, but option 2)
sounds the most manageable to me.
Otis
--- Benjamin Reitzammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> we are in the process of planning a search feature of a product and
> we
> are having quite a hard time figuring out
In my experience, searching a read only index mounted via NFS is fine.
The NFS related issues are with locking.
I'd agree with Chris that you should try to avoid very big indexes.
--
Ian.
On 04/08/05, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A big index is slow to merge, slow to search, and as yo
A big index is slow to merge, slow to search, and as you mentioned,
it's slow to sync. An 1G index took me several hours to merge on a P3
1GHz 512MRam.
Mounting Lucene on NFS is also a "No GO".
I feel you choice 2 may be feasible, although complicated. That's your
job, right. :)
BTW: I guess your
