1)
>> 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=field, doc=0)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Paul Libbrecht
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can the dictionary have weights?
>>>
>>> überwachungsgesetz alone probably needs a higher rank than überwachung
>>>
are combinations of other
sub-compounds.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz
hanks!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
>>
>> yes, your dictionary :)
>
--Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
>
> yes, your dictionary :)
>
> if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add
they are combinations of
other sub-compounds.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add it to your dictionary.
for example, if your dictionary is { "Rind", "Fleisch", "Draht", "Schere",
"Geset
yes, your dictionary :)
if überwachungsgesetz is a real word, add it to your dictionary.
for example, if your dictionary is { "Rind", "Fleisch", "Draht", "Schere",
"Gesetz", "Aufgabe", "Überwachung" }, and you index
Rindfleischüberwachungsgesetz, then all 3 queries will have the same score.
but i
fleischgesetz"?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:12 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using org.apache.lucene.analysis.compound
Paul, there are two implementations in compounds, one is dictionary-base
Paul, there are two implementations in compounds, one is dictionary-based,
the other is hyphenation-grammar + dictionary (it restricts the
decompounding based on hyphenation rules). You could also subclass the
compound base class and implement your own.
I haven't seen any user-measures (relevance,
I'm interested to this analyzer.. it had escaped me and solves an old
problem!
Could you report about its usage:
- did you have to feed words in a dictionary?
- does anyone have user-measures already?
... and the last question for the research fun: is there any approach
towards preferring Üb
hi, it will work because it will also decompound "Rindfleish" into Rind and
fleish, with posIncr=0
so if you index Rindfleischüberwachungsgesetz, then query with "Rindfleish",
its matching because Rindfleish also gets decompounded into Rind and fleish.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Benjamin Do
11 matches
Mail list logo