Second link is that:
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/2010/08/using-payloads-with-dismaxqparser-in.html
2013/12/1 Furkan KAMACI
> Hi;
>
> I use Solr 4.5.1 I have a case: When a user searches for some specific
> keywords some documents should be listed at much more higher than its usual
> score
Thanks a lot!
I will deffenitely will go thoroughly over these
2009/4/27 Murat Yakici
> See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed
> and http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed
> and http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ConcurrentAccessToIndex
>
> Murat Yakici
> D
See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed
and http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed
and http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ConcurrentAccessToIndex
Murat Yakici
Department of Computer & Information Sciences
University of Strathclyde
Glasgow, UK
Yes, I agree with you - I also tried this approach in the past and it was
terribely slow - looping on the term vectors.
What I have done - is dividing indexes into steps - which of course, if can
be avoided, it will be more than great!!
As for my problem - it was a code problems, I sloved it, th
See my comments:
> Yes, for this specific part, I have this prior knowledge which is based on
> a
> training set.
> About the things you raise here, there are two things you might mean, I am
> not sure:
>
> 1. If you don't have that "prior" knowledge, then all it means you need to
> modify the f
Yes, for this specific part, I have this prior knowledge which is based on a
training set.
About the things you raise here, there are two things you might mean, I am
not sure:
1. If you don't have that "prior" knowledge, then all it means you need to
modify the formula of the score, no? to give mo
Yes, this is more or less what I had in mind. However, for this approach
one requires some *prior knowledge* of the vocabulary of the document (or
the collection) to produce that score before even it gets analyzed, isn't
it? And this is the paradox that I have been thinking. If you have that
knowl
Thanks, Murat.
It was very useful - I also tried to override IndexWriter and
DocumentsWriter instead, but it didn't work well. DocumentsWriter can't be
overriden.
So, I didn't find a better way to make the changes.
My needs are having for every term in different documents different values.
So, l
Here is what I am doing, not so magical... There are two classes, an
analyzer and an a TokenStream in which I can inject my document dependent
data to be stored as payload.
private PayloadAnalyzer panalyzer = new PayloadAnalyzer();
private class PayloadAnalyzer extends Analyzer {
Dear Murat,
I saw your question and wondered how did you implement these changes?
The requirement below are the same ones as I am trying to code now.
Did you modify the source code itself or only used Lucene's jar and just
override code?
I would very much apprecicate if you could give me a short
No, just checking. I will let you everyone know I see one.
Cheers,
Murat
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Murat Yakici wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I started playing with the experimental payload functionality. I
>> have written an analyzer which adds a payload (some sort of a score/
>> boost) for each te
On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Murat Yakici wrote:
Hi,
I started playing with the experimental payload functionality. I
have written an analyzer which adds a payload (some sort of a score/
boost) for each term occurance. The payload/score for each term is
dependent on the document that the t
12 matches
Mail list logo
