Sorry for the delay, I opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6469. It can go to trunk
and 5.x (the value of x depending on when it's ready :)).
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan
wrote:
>>
>> Would you like to submit a patch that changes SortingMergePolicy to
>>
>
> Would you like to submit a patch that changes SortingMergePolicy to
> use the approach that you are proposing using bitsets instead of
> sorting int[] arrays?
Sure can do that. Can you open a ticket for this, as I don't know what
versions this can go in?
--
Ravi
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan
wrote:
> Thanks for the comments…
>
> My only
>> concern about using the FixedBitSet is that it would make sorting each
>> postings list run in O(maxDoc) but maybe we can make it better by
>> using SparseFixedBitSet
>
>
> Yes I was also thin
Thanks. Glad that it has been pro-actively identified and fixed
--
Ravi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan
> wrote:
>
> > b) CompressingStoredFieldsReader did not store the last decoded 32KB
> chunk.
> > Our segments a
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan
wrote:
> b) CompressingStoredFieldsReader did not store the last decoded 32KB chunk.
> Our segments are already sorted before participating in a merge. On mostly
> linear merge, we ended up decoding the same chunk again and again. Simply
> s
Thanks for the comments…
My only
> concern about using the FixedBitSet is that it would make sorting each
> postings list run in O(maxDoc) but maybe we can make it better by
> using SparseFixedBitSet
Yes I was also thinking about this. But we are on 4.x and did not take the
plunge. But as you sa
I like these ideas, the int[] we are using today are wasteful. My only
concern about using the FixedBitSet is that it would make sorting each
postings list run in O(maxDoc) but maybe we can make it better by
using SparseFixedBitSet (added in 5.0, given your code snippets I
assume you are still on 4