: 2) I doubt that ordering on 2 fields like "time" up to sec (or even to min)
: and "integer" will be quicker when sorting using just one "long"
i wouldn't be so sure untill you benchmark it ...
The biggest issue is the total number of Terms per field that come into
play when you sort ... with m
Golovatyi/X/GP/Novartis)
06.04.2005 23:51 Subject: Re: Sorting date
stored in milliseconds time
Please respond to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:02:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm forced to keep date up to milisec. The reason is simple: I get at
> least a couple of new messages per sec, if all of them are stamped with the
> same time, the retrieval order id undefined, i.e. once I get it, let's
> say,
(bcc: Iouli
Golovatyi/X/GP/Novartis)
28.02.2005 08:47 Subject: Re: Sorting date
stored in milliseconds time
Please respond to
