hi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:13 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, that's wha
http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Dawid Weiss
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 7:51:39 AM
> Subject: Re: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
&g
ne - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:54:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOv
stack?
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message ----
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: T
ematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Uwe Schindler
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:54:44 PM
> Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
is buggy.
Uwe
> - Original Message
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:36:13 PM
> > Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
> >
> > Hi Otis,
> >
> > Can you r
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 5:36:13 PM
> Subject: RE: SorterTemplate.quickSort causes StackOverflowError
>
> Hi Otis,
>
> Can you reproduce this somehow and send test code? I could look into it. I
> don't expect the error in the quicksor
Hi Otis,
Can you reproduce this somehow and send test code? I could look into it. I
don't expect the error in the quicksort algorithm itself as this one is used
e.g. BytesRefHash / TermsHash, if there is a bug we would have seen it long
time ago.
I have not seen this before, but I suspect a probl
Hi Otis,
I have exactly the same scenario, also on 3.1, the only difference is I have
less queries, like 20 or 30.
Yesterday this code processed over 1 million incoming docs (in
a synthetic test), and did not get any error...
Not very helpful maybe but just so you get some other feedback.
javie
