sorting, right? It
> gives me the same result...
>
> Thanks in advance
> Mirko
>
>
>
> Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um 13:03 Uhr
> Von: "Michael McCandless"
> An: "Lucene Users"
> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4
Empty
Sort()" bug? I should probably use Sort.INDEXORDER for sorting, right? It gives
me the same result...
Thanks in advance
Mirko
Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um 13:03 Uhr
Von: "Michael McCandless"
An: "Lucene Users"
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Strange performan
If new Sort() fails to sort by score, that's a bug! Can you please
open a Jira issue?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Mirko Sertic wrote:
> Hi
>
> Basically i am running a load test. For every run i executed about 1 million
> queries on the same
Hi
Basically i am running a load test. For every run i executed about 1 million
queries on the same index with the same query string, so it should be warmed up
very well ;-) It performs about 8x faster with an empty Sort() instance than
the first option. Still do not get it. An empty Sort insta
