Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-07 Thread Michael McCandless
44278 total vector count; avg 1 term/freq > vector fields per doc] > No problems were detected with this index. > > 2011-04-06 > > 袁武 [GMail] > ____________________ > 发件人: Michael McCandless > 发送时间: 2011-04-02 21:11:05 > 收件人

Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-06 Thread 袁武 [GMail]
a-user 主题: Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition So your test case still hits the exception in 3.1? If you fully rebuild you index in 3.1, does the exception still occur? Is there any way I could get access to this index? Do other terms besides "\1" have the problem

Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-05 Thread 袁武 [GMail]
me a new recent copy of CheckIndex in jar, I will run it and send you the report as soon as possible. Great thanks. 2011-04-06 袁武 [GMail] 发件人: Michael McCandless 发送时间: 2011-04-02 21:11:05 收件人: 袁武 [GMail] 抄送: java-user 主题: Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition So

Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-02 Thread Michael McCandless
gt; Thanks to your help > > 2011-04-02 > > 袁武 [GMail] > > 发件人: Michael McCandless > 发送时间: 2011-04-02 00:13:35 > 收件人: 袁武 [GMail] > 抄送: java-user > 主题: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition > Hmm so it's not index

Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-02 Thread 袁武 [GMail]
: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition Hmm so it's not index corruption. Curious. Which Lucene version are you using? Looks like it's 2.9, but not 2.9.4? Can you try 2.9.4 and see if you still hit the problem? Can you post a small test case showing the problem, on

Re: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-02 Thread 袁武 [GMail]
if (tp != null) tp.close(); } } thanks. 2011-04-02 袁武 [GMail] 发件人: Michael McCandless 发送时间: 2011-04-02 00:13:35 收件人: 袁武 [GMail] 抄送: java-user 主题: Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition Hmm so it's

Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-01 Thread Michael McCandless
Hmm so it's not index corruption. Curious. Which Lucene version are you using? Looks like it's 2.9, but not 2.9.4? Can you try 2.9.4 and see if you still hit the problem? Can you post a small test case showing the problem, on your index? Mike http://blog.mikemccandless.com 2011/4/1 袁武 [GMai

Re: Re: A likely bug of TermsPosition.nextPosition

2011-04-01 Thread 袁武 [GMail]
Hi, Dear Mike: belows list the report of checkIndex. OS is Fedora Linux. [oracle@server bin]$ java -classpath ./ org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex /data/Index/URL/Generic/ -fix NOTE: testing will be more thorough if you run java with '-ea:org.apache.lucene...', so assertions are enabled Openi