Genève 2
> Tél. direct : +41 (0)22 388 00 95
> michel.paw...@etat.ge.ch
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : mardi, 28. septembre 2010 07:57
> À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage
---Message d'origine-
De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi, 28. septembre 2010 07:57
À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage recommendations
You said you have 1000 fields...when performing search do you search
in all 1000 fie
seems required :-/
> 12) ok
>
> Regards,
>
> Michel
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : lundi, 27. septembre 2010 14:53
> À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage recommendations
>
optimized the index the average search
time dropped from 10s to below 2s, now (after 2.5 weeks) the average search
time is 7s. Optimization seems required :-/
12) ok
Regards,
Michel
-Message d'origine-
De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi, 27. septembre 2010 14
Lucene 2.1 is really old...you should be able to migrate to lucene 2.9
without changing your code (almost jar drop-in, but be careful on
analyzers), and there could be huge improvements if you use lucene
properly.
Few questions:
- what does "all data to be indexed is stored in DB fields" mean? you
