right we do analyze a number of fields. We use the WHiteSpace
whenever we have a text field. So maybe 5 on average per guy. Can be
more of course.
Thanks,
Jason Tesser
dotCMS Lead Development Manager
1-305-858-1422
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
> Hi -
>
> One thing to cons
Hi -
One thing to consider is field norms. If your fields aren't analyzed, this
doesn't apply to you.
But if you do have norms, I believe that it's one by per field with norms x
number of documents. It doesn't matter if the field occurs in a document or
not, it's nTotalFields x nDocs.
So, an ind
Hi,
just sharing some personal experiences in this domain,
We performed some benchmarks in a similar setup (indexing millions of
documents with thousands of fields) to measure the impact of large
number of fields on a Lucene index.
We observed that more you have fields, more the dictionary wil
As far as I know, no problem. There's no penalty that I
know of for having this kind of setup. Of course your
mileage may vary, and a relevant question is "why do
you care?" That is, if your total index is 100M in size,
pretty much no matter how Lucene implements the internal
data structures you wo
