Re: Question about IndexCommit

2009-09-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Subject: Question about IndexCommit : In-Reply-To: <9ac0c6aa0909010403k3306307dxa7751ecff3fa2...@mail.gmail.com> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to an existing message, inst

Re: Question about IndexCommit

2009-09-01 Thread Ted Stockwell
That's excellent. Thanks very much for the explanations - Original Message > From: Michael McCandless > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 8:26:45 AM > Subject: Re: Question about IndexCommit > > Further, when IndexWrite

Re: Question about IndexCommit

2009-09-01 Thread Michael McCandless
Further, when IndexWriter writes new .del files, it's always to a new (next generation) filename, so that the old .del file remains present. This means if a fresh IndexReader is opened, it will load the old .del file, and still not see any of IndexWriter's pending changes. Mike On Tue, Sep 1, 20

Re: Question about IndexCommit

2009-09-01 Thread Shai Erera
If I'm not mistaken, IndexReader reads the .del file into memory, and therefore subsequent updates to it won't be visible to it. Shai On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Ted Stockwell wrote: > Hi All, > > I am interested in using Lucene to index RDF (Resource Description Format) > data. > Ultimatel