> I have 3 questions:
>
> 1) XML query parser just focuses on the "difficult" queries, left the
> "simple" ones to the standard query parser.
> I think it'll be good to support all of the queries. Makes it easier to
> implement, rather than combine two different parser together.
"Lucene in Act
It's great that this is supported. I have 3 questions:
1) XML query parser just focuses on the "difficult" queries, left the
"simple" ones to the standard query parser.
I think it'll be good to support all of the queries. Makes it easier to
implement, rather than combine two different parser to
0 8:32 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Query about Query.ToString()
>
> Yes it is being maintained and I have it in production on many large
> systems.
> Phrase prefix wildcard etc can be supported using the "UserQuery" tag
> which hands off to the
Yes it is being maintained and I have it in production on many large systems.
Phrase prefix wildcard etc can be supported using the "UserQuery" tag which
hands off to the regular Lucene QueryParser. It would be easy to add XML tags
for these types but these clauses tend to be provided by users a
XMLQueryParser is pretty good start. However, is it being maintained
recently?
I noticed many Query class are not supported, like PrefixQuery, or even
PhraseQuery.
Is it for some particular reason or simply lack of resource?
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Scalable Full-Text Sea
This was part of the rationale for creating the XMLQueryParser which can be
found in contrib.
See here for the background:
http://marc.info/?l=lucene-dev&m=113355526731460&w=2
On 17 Feb 2010, at 18:44, Aaron Schon wrote:
> Hi all, I know that persisting a Lucene query by query ToString() meth
k Erickson
Sent: Wed 2/17/2010 1:55 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query about Query.ToString()
Well, Query *does* implement the Serializable interface, so that
might work. WARNING: I haven't personally used the Serializable
interface on Query, so I have no real clue whe
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, Query *does* implement the Serializable interface, so that
> might work. WARNING: I haven't personally used the Serializable
> interface on Query, so I have no real clue whether it's applicable!
>
Query is serializable (lots of peopl
Well, Query *does* implement the Serializable interface, so that
might work. WARNING: I haven't personally used the Serializable
interface on Query, so I have no real clue whether it's applicable!
Taking the results of query.toString() and pumping it back through
the parser is not guaranteed to pr
