Sure thing. I actually haven't taken a sufficiently close look at
NearSpansOrdered (I was concentrating more on NearSpansUnordered, which has
got next to no documentation).
- Moti
On 5/7/07, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Moti,
I have not yet looked into all the details of your comme
Moti,
I have not yet looked into all the details of your comments,
but I remember I had some trouble in trying to define the precise
semantics of NearSpansOrdered. I'll have another look at
being more precise for the overlaps.
NearSpansUnordered is a specialisation of the previous NearSpans
for t
Paul,
The comment should be moved up into SpanNearQuery itself (as opposed to the
comments in the package private implementation classes). Still though, that
comment is inaccurate (regarding overlap - only "exact" overlap is handled).
Here are some additional tests for SpanNearQuery. They all fai
Moti,
I tried your test and it fails in the way you describe, however, I don't think
the test shows a bug.
Below is the javadoc comment for the package private class NearSpansOrdered.
Would that be sufficient documentation for the ordered case?
/** A Spans that is formed from the ordered subspa
