Re: New Lucene QueryParser

2007-01-03 Thread Mark Miller
Looks like interesting stuff Mark, but why did you make everything so configurable (syntax-wise)? IMO, there is a lot of value to standards, and doing things like changing the precedence of operators isn't necessarily a good thing :-) I made it so configurable because I needed to implement a

Re: New Lucene QueryParser

2007-01-03 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 12/5/06, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have finally delved back into the Lucene Query parser that I started a few months back. Looks like interesting stuff Mark, but why did you make everything so configurable (syntax-wise)? IMO, there is a lot of value to standards, and doing th

Re: New Lucene QueryParser

2007-01-03 Thread Mark Miller
Hey Laurent, I am actually pretty much ready for a beta/preview release right about now. All of the features are in and I am pretty happy with most of the work. Over the past month I have been squashing bugs and could certainly use as much help as I can get making sure this thing is as perfect

Re: New Lucene QueryParser

2007-01-03 Thread Laurent Hoss
Hi Mark As said in a previous mail, I'm very interested in your Parser and I'm happy to hear you made progress , and implemented Paragraph/Sentence proximity search functionality. :) This is the killer feature for me! and if the execution of the resulting query ( a mix containing SpanQuery 's