Re: NOT_ANALYSED_NO_NORMS should get max field length boost

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Paul Taylor > wrote: Lucene in Action says you can possibly use NOT_ANALYSED_NO_NORMS when indexing fields that arent tokenized, but later says norms are used to boost fields with less /single term, so matches based

Re: NOT_ANALYSED_NO_NORMS should get max field length boost

Erick Erickson wrote: Are you saying that you index the *same* field differently in different documents? Or do you index the field in question in the same way in all documents? Same way in all documents I ask because I'm having a hard time following the logic here. A field that is NOT analyzed

Re: NOT_ANALYSED_NO_NORMS should get max field length boost

Are you saying that you index the *same* field differently in different documents? Or do you index the field in question in the same way in all documents? I ask because I'm having a hard time following the logic here. A field that is NOT analyzed is an all-or-none match, i.e. looking for "paul" in