ards
> Mirko
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 17:12
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: NFS, Stale File Handle Problem and my thoughts
>
> Yes, normal merging will cause
achricht-
> Von: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 16:14
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: NFS, Stale File Handle Problem and my thoughts
>
> Right, it's only machine A that needs the deletion policy. All
eded files are taken from the
>> >> IndexDeletionPolicy, and deleted at 12:30. At this point the files to be
>> >> deleted should no longer be required by any IndexReader and can be
>> safely
>> >> deleted.
>> >>
>> >> So the IndexDeletionPolicy should be
t; >> Machine B has read only access.
> >>
> >> Would this be a valid setup? The only limitation is there is only ONE
> >> IndexWriter box, and multiple IndexReader boxes. Based on our
> requirements,
> >> this should fix very well. I really want to avoid s
this should fix very well. I really want to avoid some kind of index
>> replication between the boxes...
>>
>> Regards
>> Mirko
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
>> Gese
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 14:45
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: NFS, Stale File Handle Problem and my thoughts
>
> Right, you just need to make a custom Ind
ween the boxes...
>
> Regards
> Mirko
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 14:45
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: NFS, Stale File Handle Problem and
Right, you just need to make a custom IndexDeletionPolicy. NFS makes
no effort to protect deletion of still-open files.
A simple approach is one that only deletes a commit if it's more than
XXX minutes/hours old, such that XXX is set higher than the frequency
that IndexReaders are guaranteed to h
